A good catch is when a worker spots and reports or corrects a hazard or error before it causes an incident, turning a potential harm into a learning opportunity.

A good catch is a situation where someone notices a hazard, unsafe condition or error and reports or corrects it before it leads to an injury, damage or other loss. The term emphasizes the positive action of the person who caught the problem, rather than how close the organization came to harm.
Good catches are closely related to near misses. Many organizations use "good catch" for an issue stopped before an event began, such as a frayed sling removed from service, and "near miss" for an event that happened but did not cause harm, such as a dropped tool landing close to a worker. Some use the terms interchangeably. Either way, these reports reveal weaknesses while the cost of learning is still low, which is why healthcare, aviation, energy, construction and manufacturing all encourage them.
Serious incidents rarely come out of nowhere. They usually follow a series of smaller warning signs, such as worn equipment, workarounds or confusing procedures, that people noticed but did not report. A steady flow of good catch reports gives safety teams a view of those unsafe conditions early, when fixing them is quick and cheap.
No OSHA regulation requires a good catch program. However, OSHA's Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs encourage employers to have workers report injuries, illnesses, near misses and hazards, and to act on those reports. Under 29 CFR 1904.35(b)(1)(iv), employers may not retaliate against employees for reporting work-related injuries or illnesses. OSHA's 2018 guidance on safety incentive programs stated that programs rewarding workers for reporting near misses or hazards are always permissible under that rule.
ISO 45001, the international standard for occupational health and safety management systems, defines an incident as an occurrence that could or does result in injury and ill health, and notes that events with potential but no harm may be called near misses, near hits or close calls. The standard expects organizations to report, investigate and act on incidents, which includes these no-harm events.
At a distribution center, a forklift operator doing a pre-shift inspection notices that the hydraulic hose on her truck has a bulge near a fitting. She tags the truck out of service and submits a good catch report with a photo. Maintenance replaces the hose that morning and, prompted by the report, checks the rest of the fleet. They find two more hoses showing early wear.
The site safety lead shares the report at the next shift huddle and thanks the operator by name. The maintenance team adds hose condition to the preventive maintenance checklist, and the safety committee notes that hose issues have now appeared in three reports in a year. They contact the equipment supplier about a possible routing problem that causes the wear.
Many organizations use good catch for a hazard or error found before anything happens and near miss for an event that occurred without injury. Some treat them as the same thing. The key is to define the terms clearly in your own program.
Recognition helps, and OSHA has said that rewarding near miss and hazard reporting is permissible. Keep rewards simple and focused on participation and quality rather than volume.
No. The OSHA 300 Log records work-related injuries and illnesses that meet recording criteria. Good catches involve no injury, so they are tracked in internal systems instead.
Everyone, including employees, supervisors, contractors and visitors. Field and lone workers should have a simple way to report from wherever they are working.
Part of SafetyIQ's EHS glossary: plain-English definitions of workplace health and safety terms.
> Keep learning
> See it in action
Capture hazards, run inspections, track training and close out corrective actions in one platform built for high-risk, field-heavy work.
Book my free demo