Near misses are some of the most overlooked yet valuable data points in workplace safety. Because no one was injured and no property was damaged, near misses are often dismissed as “close calls” rather than treated as warnings. In reality, every near miss is a signal—an opportunity to identify hazards, strengthen controls, and prevent future incidents before they escalate.
Organizations with mature safety programs understand that near misses are not failures. They are early indicators of risk and some of the most powerful tools available for improving safety performance. When properly reported, analyzed, and acted upon, near misses help organizations move from reactive safety to proactive prevention.
This article explores what near misses are, why they matter, and how organizations can use near miss reporting to build safer, more resilient workplaces.
A near miss is an unplanned event that did not result in injury, illness, or damage—but had the potential to do so. In many cases, the difference between a near miss and a serious incident is timing, chance, or a small environmental factor.
Examples of near misses include:
Although no harm occurred, the hazard was present. Treating near misses as inconsequential ignores the underlying risk that could cause a more serious outcome in the future.
Near misses matter because they provide insight into risk without the cost of injury or damage. They reveal weaknesses in processes, training, equipment, or environmental controls—before someone gets hurt.
Safety research consistently shows that serious incidents are often preceded by multiple near misses. For every major injury, there are usually many minor incidents and even more near misses that went unreported or unaddressed.
Tracking near misses helps organizations identify patterns and intervene earlier. Some hazards only become visible when something almost goes wrong. Near misses highlight risks that may not be captured during routine inspections or audits.
Additionally, near miss reporting shifts safety from reacting to incidents to preventing them. Instead of waiting for an injury to occur, organizations can correct hazards based on early warning signs.
Despite their value, near misses are often underreported. Understanding why helps organizations address the root causes.
Employees may worry that reporting a near miss will lead to punishment, criticism, or negative attention. If safety culture focuses on fault rather than learning, reporting declines.
When no injury occurs, employees may assume the event is not worth reporting. This mindset overlooks the preventive value of near-miss data.
If employees don’t know how or where to report near misses—or if the process is time-consuming—they are less likely to report them. When near misses are reported but no action is taken, employees stop reporting. Lack of feedback signals that reporting doesn’t matter.
It’s important to clearly distinguish near misses from incidents while recognizing their connection.
Both require investigation, but near misses provide an opportunity to learn without the consequences of harm. Organizations that treat near misses with the same seriousness as incidents are better positioned to prevent injuries.
A strong near miss program is a reflection of a healthy safety culture.
When employees feel safe reporting near misses, it signals trust. Open communication allows risks to surface early and consistently. Near miss reporting also gives workers a voice in safety. It reinforces the idea that safety is everyone’s responsibility—not just management’s.
Focusing on system improvements rather than individual mistakes encourages transparency and continuous improvement.
Creating a successful near miss program requires more than a reporting form. It requires intention, consistency, and leadership support.
Clearly explain what qualifies as a near miss and provide real examples relevant to your workplace. When definitions are vague, reporting suffers.
Reporting should be quick and accessible. Whether digital or paper-based, the process should take minutes—not hours.
Key principles:
Acknowledging reports and taking action builds trust. Even small corrective actions demonstrate that reporting leads to real change.
Near miss investigations should focus on:
The goal is learning - not discipline.
Communicating trends and lessons learned helps prevent similar near misses elsewhere. This reinforces the value of reporting and keeps safety top of mind.
Near miss reporting should be tracked as a leading indicator of safety performance.
Useful metrics include:
An increase in near miss reporting is often a positive sign, indicating improved awareness and trust—not declining safety.
Leadership involvement is critical to near miss success.
Effective leaders:
When safety leaders treat near misses seriously, employees follow suit.
Near misses are not just safety data points, but they are opportunities to strengthen systems, processes, and behaviors. Organizations that consistently capture and act on near miss information are better equipped to adapt to change, manage risk, and protect their workforce.
Rather than asking, “Why report something that didn’t cause harm?” the better question is, “Why wait until something does?”
By recognizing near misses as early warnings and integrating them into everyday safety practices, organizations can move closer to the ultimate goal of workplace safety: preventing incidents before they happen.